You can sell music royalties online through platforms like Royalty Exchange, SongVest, ANote Music, and SPACE Music. These marketplaces connect rights holders directly with investors without requiring a broker. But before you list, you should know your catalog’s value — most sellers who skip this step end up accepting offers below market rate.
→ Get a free catalog valuation — know what your royalties are worth before you list anywhere.
Online royalty marketplaces have made it possible for independent artists, songwriters, and rights holders to monetize their catalogs without the need for industry connections or a traditional broker. In the past decade, platforms like Royalty Exchange have collectively facilitated over $200 million in transactions between rightsholders and investors.
But “accessible” doesn’t automatically mean “optimal.” These platforms have different strengths, weaknesses, fee structures, and buyer pools — and the right choice depends heavily on what you’re selling, how much it’s worth, and what outcome you’re optimizing for.
This guide gives you an honest, balanced view of the major platforms, the process you’ll go through, the pitfalls to avoid, and why a professional valuation before you list anywhere is the single smartest thing you can do.
The Four Major Online Royalty Platforms Compared
Royalty Exchange
Website: royaltyexchange.com
Model: Auction marketplace for royalty streams
Best for: Publishing royalties, master royalties, PRO income streams
Minimum catalog size: Typically $5,000+ in annual royalties
Royalty Exchange is the largest and most established platform in this space. Founded in 2011, it operates as an auction marketplace: you list your royalty stream, investors bid, and the highest bid wins. The platform reports 30,000+ registered investors on its platform, which creates genuine competitive pressure on pricing — the auction format is one of Royalty Exchange’s core strengths.
How it works for sellers:
- Submit your royalty data for review
- Platform analyzes and prepares a listing
- Auction runs for a fixed period (typically 2–3 weeks)
- You accept or reject the final bid
- Deal closes; transfer documented and completed
Fee structure: Royalty Exchange charges sellers a transaction fee on completed sales. The fee varies based on deal size; expect roughly 10%–20% of the sale price depending on the transaction, payable upon completion. Verify current rates directly with the platform before listing, as fee structures can change.
Strengths:
- Large, established investor base creates competitive auctions
- Strong educational content and transparency around valuation methodology
- Track record of $200M+ in completed transactions
- Good for mid-size catalogs and individual royalty streams
Limitations:
- Primarily investor-focused; content skews toward buyers rather than sellers
- Auction format means you may not maximize price if the auction doesn’t attract sufficient competition
- Limited buyer pool compared to a private broker process for large catalogs
- Seller fees can be significant on smaller transactions
SongVest
Website: songvest.com
Model: Direct marketplace for song ownership and royalty shares
Best for: Individual songs, publishing royalty streams
Minimum catalog size: No stated minimum
SongVest differentiates itself by charging no seller fees — the platform earns its revenue from buyers. For sellers of smaller catalogs or individual songs, this fee structure is attractive. The platform also offers free valuations as part of the onboarding process.
How it works for sellers:
- Submit your song/catalog for free valuation
- SongVest prepares a listing
- Song is offered to investors (not an auction format — more of a direct listing)
- Interested buyers negotiate or purchase at the listed price
Fee structure: No seller fees. Buyers pay the platform’s fees.
Strengths:
- Zero seller fees is genuinely differentiating for smaller transactions
- Free valuation service provides some baseline guidance
- Relatively accessible for independent artists with smaller catalogs
Limitations:
- Thinner investor base than Royalty Exchange — less competitive buyer pool
- Limited public data on completed transaction values, making it harder to benchmark pricing
- Content and educational resources are notably sparse; limited guidance for sellers navigating the process
- Non-auction format may not achieve the highest possible price in competitive market conditions
ANote Music
Website: anotemusic.com
Model: Fractional music rights marketplace (European focus)
Best for: European rightsholders; sellers open to fractional/partial sales
Minimum catalog size: Variable; platform accepts various catalog sizes
ANote Music operates differently from the US-focused platforms: it’s built around fractional ownership. Rather than selling your entire royalty stream to a single buyer, ANote allows you to sell a portion of your catalog to multiple investors, each acquiring a small fractional share. A secondary market allows investors to trade their shares after the initial offering.
How it works for sellers:
- Apply and submit catalog data
- ANote values the catalog and structures the offering
- Catalog is listed for a fundraising period (similar to an IPO process)
- Multiple investors purchase fractional shares, collectively providing capital to the seller
- Seller retains the unsold portion and receives ongoing royalty income on that share
Fee structure: ANote charges fees on completed transactions; structure varies by deal. Consult directly for current terms.
Strengths:
- European compliance and infrastructure — well-suited for EU-based rightsholders
- Fractional model allows partial monetization without full sale
- Secondary market gives investors liquidity, which can increase the attractiveness of your listing
- Theoretically allows price discovery through market dynamics over time
Limitations:
- Fractional sales are complex — co-ownership with many investors has practical implications
- Less suited to sellers seeking immediate, full-catalog liquidity
- Smaller market than US platforms for English-language music
- The ongoing co-ownership relationship requires transparent administration
SPACE Music
Website: spacemusic.io
Model: Direct purchase platform for ambient/lo-fi/meditation music
Best for: Ambient, lo-fi, meditation, focus, and sleep music creators
Minimum catalog size: Not specified
SPACE Music occupies a highly specific niche: it exclusively acquires ambient, lo-fi, meditation, focus, and sleep music catalogs. If your catalog falls into these genres, SPACE offers a distinctive proposition — a 24-hour cash offer, fast close, and built-in calculator tool.
How it works for sellers:
- Submit your catalog information through their calculator tool
- Receive a cash offer within 24 hours
- Accept or decline; close quickly if you accept
Fee structure: SPACE operates as a direct buyer, not a marketplace, so there are no platform fees in the traditional sense.
Strengths:
- Speed: 24-hour offer is unmatched among platforms
- Simplicity: No auction, no listing, no waiting for buyers
- Built-in calculator provides instant valuation context
Limitations:
- Extremely narrow scope — only relevant if your catalog is ambient/lo-fi/meditation
- As a direct buyer, SPACE sets the price rather than competing for it — you have limited negotiating leverage
- No competitive process means you likely leave money on the table compared to a broker-led sale or auction
Platform Comparison Summary
| Platform | Fee Model | Best For | Auction? | Geographic Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royalty Exchange | ~10–20% seller fee | Mid-size catalogs; PRO income streams | Yes | US/global |
| SongVest | No seller fee | Small catalogs; individual songs | No | US |
| ANote Music | Transaction fee | EU rightsholders; fractional sales | No (IPO-style) | Europe |
| SPACE Music | No fee (direct buyer) | Ambient/lo-fi/meditation only | No | Global |
The Online Royalty Selling Process: Step by Step
Regardless of which platform you use, the process follows a broadly similar path:
Step 1: Gather your royalty data You’ll need at least 2–3 years of royalty statements from your PRO (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, PRS, etc.) and any distributors. Clean, organized statements speed up the review process.
Step 2: Submit and get a valuation Most platforms will analyze your data and give you an initial value estimate. This is useful context, but be aware that platform valuations are designed to attract you to list — they may not reflect what the market will actually pay.
Step 3: Prepare your listing The platform will help structure your listing, including income history, notable songs, income source breakdown, and an asking price or reserve (minimum acceptable bid).
Step 4: Auction or direct listing goes live For auction platforms, a bidding window opens (typically 2–3 weeks). Direct listing platforms simply put your catalog in front of their investor community.
Step 5: Receive and evaluate offers In an auction, the highest bid wins (if it meets your reserve). In a direct listing, you may receive one or multiple inquiries at various price points.
Step 6: Accept or decline You are not obligated to accept any offer. If bids don’t meet your minimum, you can withdraw and try a different approach.
Step 7: Due diligence and close The winning buyer/investor will typically conduct brief due diligence (verifying income data) before final close. The platform handles the transfer documentation.
The Biggest Pitfall: Selling Before You Know Your Value
This is the issue that most undermines catalog sellers who use online platforms: they accept offers without knowing what their catalog is actually worth in the broader market.
Platform valuations are a starting point, not an endpoint. They’re calibrated to generate listings — and they may underestimate your catalog’s value, particularly if your income has strong sync history, growing trends, or premium catalog characteristics that a simple multiple doesn’t capture.
Here’s what happens when sellers skip an independent valuation:
- They accept an 8x multiple when their catalog warrants 14x
- They list a catalog with a low reserve that gets bid up only slightly
- They don’t realize their catalog is large enough to attract professional acquisition funds who would pay significantly more
Before listing on any platform, know your number. Our music catalog valuation guide explains the methodology in detail. Use our free Music Catalog Valuation Calculator to generate a baseline estimate. If your catalog generates more than $50,000–$100,000 per year in royalties, seriously consider whether a platform is the right channel at all — a broker-led process may yield substantially more.
Online Platforms vs. Broker-Led Sales: When to Use Each
| Factor | Online Platform | Broker-Led Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Catalog annual royalties | Under $50,000–$100,000 | Above $100,000–$500,000 |
| Speed | Faster (weeks to months) | Slower (months to a year) |
| Price maximization | Limited by platform’s buyer pool | Higher — competitive, wider buyer universe |
| Complexity | Lower | Higher — more documentation, negotiation |
| Your industry connections | Not needed | Broker brings the connections |
| Fee structure | Platform fee at close | Broker fee (5–15% of deal) |
For most independent artists selling a single royalty stream or a catalog worth under $500,000, online platforms are a legitimate and accessible option. For catalogs worth $500,000 or more, the economics of a broker-led competitive sale typically justify the broker’s fee many times over.
For a full guide to working with brokers, read our article on music catalog brokers.
Smart Strategies for Maximizing Your Online Royalty Sale
1. Don’t list on only one platform Unless a platform requires exclusivity (read the terms carefully), you can approach multiple platforms for preliminary valuations before deciding where to list. This gives you comparison data and helps you identify which platform’s investor base is the best fit for your catalog.
2. Optimize your LTM royalties before listing Your Last Twelve Months (LTM) royalty income is the primary input into your catalog’s value. If you have unpublished sync opportunities, international registration gaps, or PRO registration issues, fixing these before you list can materially increase your offer.
3. Set a realistic reserve If using an auction platform, set a minimum bid that reflects your valuation research — not the platform’s estimate. A too-low reserve results in undervaluation; a too-high reserve results in no bids. Our valuation calculator can help you find the right anchor.
4. Prepare your documentation before submitting Having clean royalty statements, copyright registrations, and income summaries organized before you submit will speed up the process and signal to buyers that your catalog is well-maintained — which reduces their perceived risk and supports a higher price.
5. Don’t accept the first bid automatically Even on auction platforms, if the highest bid comes in below your reserve or below your valuation research, it’s okay to decline and try again — perhaps on a different platform or through a different approach. Don’t let sunk time pressure you into accepting a below-market deal.
A Note on Fees: Calculate Your Net Proceeds Before You List
Platform fees can meaningfully affect your net proceeds. Before listing, model out what you’ll actually receive:
Example:
- Catalog value (pre-fee): $200,000
- Royalty Exchange seller fee (~15%): $30,000
- Net proceeds: $170,000
Compare that against:
- Catalog value (broker-led sale, higher price): $260,000
- Broker fee (10%): $26,000
- Net proceeds: $234,000
In this example, even though the broker charges a 10% fee, the higher price achieved through a competitive broker process results in $64,000 more in net proceeds. This is why professional representation often pays for itself — and why calculating net, not gross, proceeds is the right metric.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is the best platform to sell music royalties online? It depends on your catalog. Royalty Exchange is the most established and best-suited for mid-size catalogs with PRO income. SongVest’s no-seller-fee model is attractive for smaller transactions. ANote Music serves European rightsholders and those open to fractional sales. SPACE Music is the fastest option but only for ambient/lo-fi music. None is universally “best” — the right platform depends on your catalog type, size, and goals.
How long does it take to sell music royalties online? From submission to close, most platform transactions take 1–3 months. Auction windows typically run 2–3 weeks; due diligence and closing add additional time. This is significantly faster than a broker-led private sale, which typically takes 4–8 months.
Do I pay fees on these platforms? Royalty Exchange charges sellers approximately 10–20% of the sale price. SongVest charges sellers nothing (buyers pay). ANote Music charges transaction fees on completed deals. SPACE Music operates as a direct buyer rather than a marketplace. Always confirm current fee structures directly with the platform before listing.
Can I sell just part of my royalty income? Yes. Most platforms allow partial sales — you can sell, for example, a 50% interest in your royalty stream while retaining the other 50%. ANote Music is specifically built around fractional ownership. Partial sales provide immediate capital while preserving ongoing income.
Should I get a valuation before listing on a platform? Absolutely. Platform valuations are a useful starting point, but they’re calibrated to attract listings rather than to maximize your outcome. An independent valuation — using current market multiples and your specific income data — gives you a credible floor below which you should not sell. Use our free Music Catalog Valuation Calculator before listing anywhere.
Ready to Find Out What Your Catalog Is Worth?
Use our free Music Catalog Valuation Calculator to get an instant estimate based on your royalty income, catalog age, and income mix. No obligation — just clarity before you negotiate.
Get a free catalog valuation
Find out what your music catalog is worth in today's market.